Grainy CCTV Footage Of The Incident Appears – Who Took It? From Where Was It Taken?
”Getting back to London: the only video of the SUV speeding along Westminster bridge emerged late last night and was shown on the BBC evening news. I found the same footage on the Twitter account of BBC home affairs correspondent Dominic Casciani and published it on SOTT.net (Casciani removed it from his Twitter account soon thereafter). While the footage has since appeared on several other news sites, SOTT.net was the first news website to host the video and carried it as an ‘exclusive’ (meaning it was not, at the time of publishing, available anywhere else).”
”As a result, I was contacted this morning by two AP journalists asking if SOTT.net owned the video or if we knew the source. I replied in the negative on both counts, but suggested it might be CCTV footage and therefore the legal property of Westminster city council. One of the AP reporters was able to tell me that he had contacted Westminster city council and they had denied that it was from any of their cameras.
First, check out the video @ Sott.net.”
”There are three initial things to note: 1) the vertical angle is quite steep, suggesting that the video was taken from a relatively high altitude. 2) the video is low quality, suggesting a high zoom level. 3) the position of the camera is to the left of the center of the bridge, making it possible that the camera was located somewhere on the north bank of the river Thames.
With that information, to get an idea of the approximate locations for the camera, we need to look at some images.”
And here’s a zoom of that area with significant buildings marked
The next image is taken from this Google ‘street view’ link at the ‘altitude 360’ restaurant at the top of Millbank tower. I zoomed the image further after processing and it seems like a pretty good candidate for the location of the camera (not excluding, however, that it may have been situated on top of MI5 HQ).
”Lone Wolf” Or Wolf With Handler?
”On Wednesday 22nd March, around 2.40pm, we’re told that a ‘lone wolf’, named as 52-year-old Khalid Masood, drove a black SUV along the sidewalk of the 252m-long Westminster bridge, knocking down at least 12 pedestrians and killing two of them. The SUV is about 6 feet wide and the sidewalk about 12 feet wide. There are vehicles on one side and the stone balustrade of the bridge on the other. The SUV was traveling at least 60mph. So this was a rather difficult, if horrific, feat to carry out.”
As is often the case with such attacks in Western nations, news reports released immediately after the attack cited eyewitnesses who claimed there were two people in the car, one described as black with a goatee beard (matching the description of the man shot by police outside Parliament) and the other a white, bald male. But with only one man shot and killed and the official narrative reflecting this, these initial eyewitness reports have been shunted down the memory hole, never to be heard again.
”While eyewitness reports are inherently unreliable, this is not always true. In the case of yesterday’s attack in London, how is it possible that multiple eyewitnesses saw two people in a car (clearly enough to define skin color) when there was, in fact, only one person in the car? In other similar ‘terror car’ attacks that involved only one person, like in Nice and Berlin last year, there were no eyewitnesses who said that there were two people in the trucks used. The reason is that there was only ever one person driving.”
”So rather than dismissing the London reports as the traumatized imagination of ordinary people unaccustomed to such carnage, a much more reasonable conclusion is to assume that there was a white bald guy in the car, and that he fled the scene, and that was his intention all along, leaving his ‘partner’ to take the fall, literally.”
This scenario raises the specter of the Muslim patsy having a handler, possibly someone with nerves of steel and a heart to match. It may have been the white bald guy driving the car along Westminster bridge, mowing down people, as the Muslim patsy sat beside him. As a general rule, ignorant patsies can’t be relied on to carry out ‘terror attacks’ on their own; they might, after all, balk at the last minute.
Now, I understand that this scenario is highly implausible for those who fervently believe that there are no dark corners within the British government that actually benefit from terror attacks against British civilians to the extent that they would have a hand in carrying them out. But to hold that belief a person has to be totally ignorant of the hard official evidence that some section of the British government has, in the recent past, consciously carried out terror attacks against British citizens, and then pointed the finger at someone else.”
HashAttack2 – Westminster Bridge, not Waterloo. This is how it looked in June 2008: [Link]
Hi everybody! they did a terror drill march 19 on the Thames and if you watch one of the videos on the page link it shows they used a dummy to dump overboard into the river to practice fishing it out. [Link]
chipmonk here is another interesting article
Gladio B strikes London on Satanic holiday – one year after Brussels
Smoke and mirrors as usual. I mean do they really think that after so many lies, stage shows , false pretences and what they claim is reality, we are that stupid ? Looks to me like their IQs are going down and ours are going up. What unbelievable BS. Ok, we believe you, it was another terrorist attack, now can we get back to work because we have more important things to do than trying to digest this horse***t.
Thanks to Tap Newswire for the link and information.
GW: Another standard practice – a Crowdfunding Appeal has been set up. We gave ya the ”Show” – Now where’s the Money Honey? Furthermore one of the ”victims” is called ”Aysha Frade”. More ”wordplay” by tptwtb. Hold on a minute GW Aysha is now called Drade NOT Frade?
Well now Gideon tells us that Ms Frade worked at DLD Sith Form College. Maybe she is ”real” after all. Telegraph tells us she was a department head and taught Spanish. In The Telegraph a former neighbour of Aysha and her husband Ms Scotland of Notting Hill, states they were her neighbours for 40 years. Ayesha was 43. Quite a trip from Nottinghill to Westminster with 2 school children. What school would it be?
Will there be a ”funeral” for Aysha? The recent ”funeral” in Melbourne left a lot to be desired. It was nothing like a proper one, no flowers, and the ”father” gave a rehash of the event rather than a Eulogy. Probably couldn’t think of enough life events to fill a proper Eulogy as ”the person” most probably was a figment of someone’s imagination.
Finally why not link this ”terrorist” to the teaching profession somehow – yet another of tptwtb’s bêtes noires . For some reason the teaching profession has been one of the favourite whipping horses. Yea lay it in the General Public’s mind that teachers are bound to be radicals who are more than likely running ”terror tactics classes” in the sandpit after school – when they are not writing endless reports and slogging through DofE attainment target stats that is.