Nicholas Fairbairn and Esther Rantzen

The Hunter Davis Interview – Too Sexy For His Trews?

‘During 1994 debates regarding the age of consent in the House of Commons, Fairbairn had to be called to order by the Speaker after starting a drunken and vivid description of sodomy”‘

nicholas fairburn comment

Nicholas Fairbairn Comment in Independent.—-and-other-natural-urges-1555729.html  Prob on the Elm Guest House List

Hansard – Sir Nicholas Fairbairn (Perth and Kinross)  Why should there be an age of consent for an act of perversion at all?

Dr. Spink  My hon. and learned Friend makes his point most succinctly, and I thank him for that.

I come to the quite different argument of equality. Stonewall has predicated its case on the falsehood that there is equality between the sex acts—the point that my hon. and learned Friend has just raised. Of course, all sexual acts are not equal. The acts of incest, paedophilia, necrophilia, bestiality and buggery have been outlawed over centuries in every civilisation, and for good reason.

Associated with Esther Rantzen

‘For beneath the high camp and flirty bonhomie – she calls everyone she meets ‘m’dear’, ‘darling’ or ‘sweetheart’ – lies a thin layer of icy determination and single-mindedness. As someone who worked with her once said: ‘Esther’s charm is like a light bulb being switched on and off. There is no natural sunlight.’

Before she had the affair with Wilcox she had one with Nicholas Fairbairn MP. What did she learn from him about the political world? ‘Nothing.’ Too young? ‘I think he was a barrister then. What I did learn about was the law. That a clever defence lawyer can run rings around the police. Nicholas was a dandy. He designed his own bowler hats.’  Fairbairn was married at the time of the affair.

Esther Just Can’t Shut It – “How did he seduce me?” she asked. Then, without pausing long enough to let the reader block his ears and hum a distracting tune, she continued, “He took me to lunch at the Ritz. He gave me a long-stemmed red rose, and, when the menu arrived, barely glanced at it. ‘I think Beluga caviare and Krug champagne,’ he said The Beluga consisted of huge, succulent globes that exploded on the tongue. If ever there was an aphrodisiac meal, this was it. Nicholas took me to the lord’s house where he was staying, and the rest was inevitable.” 04 Nov 2003  Hell Esther it wasn’t ‘inevitable’.

Brown Where there is EvilSandra Brown’s Book ‘Where There Is Evil’

‘A woman in her 30s, claims the abuse began when she was just four.

And she has alleged that her father, one of Scotland’s senior establishment figures, carried out the abuse with friends, including ex-Solicitor General Sir Nicholas Fairbairn, in front of a cine camera.’

Moira Anderson’s Disappearance –

Ms Rantzen

‘Family links to Satanic cults
Admits she was abused herself as a child
Had links to a care home where a member of staff was abusing children
Knew about Jimmy Savile and did nothing about it
Dated an M.P. who was accused of being member of a paedophile ring
Founded Childline, a service for scared children who are being abused to call.’

Comment: ‘I was taught a very long time ago to – Never listen to what they say, watch what they do!

Actions don’t lie.

Now this woman Esther says one thing but always her actions have proved otherwise. Everything and every programme has shown her to be less than honest or forthright with the truth.

From Jimmy Sovile to Childline there are screaming contradictions. Her words and her actions have always been contrary.

She says whe was abused as a child, but remained at home until she was 29?

A loving home is essential she states, but she was a homewrecker?

There are too many questions for her to answer, but she must be kept at arms length from any charity involving relationships relevant to children, the elderly and the married. The information is there to be found and the questions not only need to be asked, they need to be answered.’

From The Savile Mega Thread

Time to realise who Esther Rantzen is  –

July 21, 2014

BBC Not The Nine O’ Clock News – That’s Life Spoof

UPDATE Jan 2015

Esther is on her knees.  She’s wearing a new dame’s robe.  She’s scrubbing.  Scrub Scrub Scrub.  “Out dam spot out I say.”  That bit at The Tap is now just a faded patch in her carpet but not quite gone.  Scrub Scrub Scrub.  Look though.  A new Christmas party guest has spilt more red wine over here.  Oh Dear.  Full Spill just in case.

Time for Esther Rantzen to stop the pretence.

Friday, October 19, 2012 22:51
COMMENT – dognamedblue – saw the Robert Green Rantzen video myself.

it wouldn’t surprise me if she’s totally involved in paedophilia herself
Remember the 2009 report on how the top elite at nspcc were creaming millions for themselves & shutting down help lines because they didn’t have enough cash to run them?

One effect of The Sun newspaper letting loose the puzzle as to who Uncle ‘Dick’ was, has been to take media pressure off others, alive in the current time who should be held accountable for Savile and the paedophile Satanists running Britain.  At the very top of that list would be this lady.
All promise and no attempt to save victims.

Sent in by David Turnbull Dear Tap,I am pretty sure i watched a video clip some time ago as in maybe 2 years when Esther Rantzen was stopped in the street by Robert Green acting on behalf of Hollie Greig and she was given a brief rundown of the case by Robert and tho’ it was obvious she did know something she chose to walk on and ignore him.  I can’t locate the video but if any of your readers can it would certainly put beyond any doubt the hypocritical nature of this limelight hugging wannabe shedding crocodile tears about her feigned horror at the saville disclosures.


(letter written by Peter Eyre).Letter to Esther Rantzen

Dear Esther
I am shocked that you have not attempted to become involved in the terrible case of Hollie Greig. We are looking at the satanic rape of an innocent girl from the age of 6
years for a period of 14 years. She was gang raped by not only her father and brother but also by a greater peodophile ring in the City of Aberdeen and you have been made aware of this case. My question to you as candidate for the next election is why have you not become involved in this case?
You clearly show the following as one of the main bullet points of your campaign:
  • “As Founder/President of ChildLine for 23 years, I will use my child protection experience to enhance the lives of Luton ’s children. They are our future.”
Based on this statement alone how can you ignore the Hollie Greig Case?
Are you aware that this activity is not just contained within Scotland but is rife throughout the country?
It is your duty of care, as a potential politician, to abide by your own declared agenda and in that context alone you have to respond to the extremely disturbing story.
The case of Hollie Greig will not go away. Our numbers are growing each and every day with our numbers likely to reach around 20,000 by this weekend.
I strongly urge you to nip this in the bud without delay and show the ethical and moral side of politics that many fail to identify.
Below are the links to my current series which I ask you to read through and also a link to Anne Greig’s interview on US radio. The other issue here is the fact that the UK media has been gagged by the Scottish Legal System. One would normally expect a story of gang rape and paedophelia linked with a murder to take centre stage in the media, but not in this case. This story would be classified as a “Scoop” and only the Palestine Telegraph has so far had the courage to publish this story on almost a daily basis…….why is this so?
In the event that you do not become involved in Hollies case or reply to me directly on this very important issue, I would ask you to remove the above mentioned bullet point from your webpage as it would clearly show that you are not abiding by your own principles.
Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant – 19/3/2010
I later found that this email was returned undelivered so I have included it anyway as I am sure she is reading the articles but not responding….shame on you Esther.
So there you have it, everyone is totally extremely tight lipped on the topic of Hollie Greig but we in the Palestine Telegraph continue the exposure of this big cover up at so many levels. I am sure that the ever growing “Hollies Army” are all fired up and ready to go into battle……for the Scots over the border…remember “Brave Heart” and don’t let this scum tarnish the good name of Scotland. Bless you all.
Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant – 19/3/2010

TAP – I decided to watch Esther Rantzen on ‘Who do you think you are?’.  This is what I saw.

Her father was a BBC engineer, hardly mentioned, though obviously key to her subsequent career.  Jewish parents.  Great grandfather a fraudster.  It seems to run in the family.  His police record was destroyed during WW2 (apparently).  He got away with it and the Police seemed to forget he had a criminal record on his return to UK, after doing a bunk years earlier.  Esther was pleased he got away with stealing all his clients’ money, and shooting one of his father’s servants.  Esther found it all rather hilarious.  Her father’s father, the Rantzen side, was a wealthy stockbroker with sexual history, raping a parlormaid.  Again she finds this hilarious.  Goyim.
The Rantzens were early arrivals in the 1850s from Warsaw, moving up to upper middle class level by 1880.  Climbing the social/economic ladder in those days was rare.  Her great grandfather Abraham became a diamond broker and made a fortune.  Esther’s father’s middle name was Barnato, from Barnie Barnato, one of the richest men in the world, a diamond dealer.  Her great grandmother, Sarah Isaacs, was the sister of Barnie Barnato.  He bought the right plots in South Africa, and was bought out by Cecil Rhodes for £500,000,000, the biggest cheque ever written at the time.  Barnato later disappeared off a ship without trace.  Mmmmm.  Esther acts as if she never knew and wondered what happened to all the money.  I think we can imagine.  Ester’s grandparents inherited an amount of visible funds, but peanuts compared to what must have been the real fortune.
In Warsaw the Rantzens were spelt Rancen, and long established.  Why did they leave?  They lost two children, and then he lost his brother at 44 and his father to illness.  Maybe that persuaded them to leave.  Warsaw was occupied by Russia and Russia was oppressing the Jews.  Later the Nazis burned down their home in WW2 and killed half a million or so of the neighbours.  She manages a little emotion at this stage.  Survivor guilt.  A good performance.  Great opportunity to consider some real Jewish victims.Her past is cryptic, but there are enough clues as to be able to suggest she was put forward as window dressing for the paedophiles, maybe even for Childline to act as a recruitment agency for them.  The Savile revelations are only the tip of an iceberg.  Rantzen helped them to get away with it for many decades, as most people assumed organisations like Childline were doing something to stop it all.  They weren’t.  They are part of the paedophile infrastructure that is in place, and is still to this day untouchable.
The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.

2012-10-19 22:39:14


GovWatch:  Why do they continue to hide their pestilent underbellies with ermine and silk?  Didn’t they ever read Jean-Jacques Rousseau?  The more finery you wear, the more you are hiding?  Just “Take the helmet of salvation and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God” Esther that’s all you need.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.