BARBARA KAHAN: AGE 83, DIRECTOR OF OVER 35,000 UK SHELLS WITH OVER 200,000 DIRECTORS?
http://www.thewhistleblowers.org/?cat=1420
OR is it childcare pioneer? Or both? Married to Vladimir? Vlad was studying Mental Illness in Childhood?
9 August 2000
Childcare pioneer whose ‘pindown’ scandal report prompted residential care reform
http://www.theguardian.com/news/2000/aug/09/guardianobituaries2
“I know it’s a BBC programme but it’s worth a listen to the Radio 4 programme broadcast on the 24th Feb about council insurers hindering abuse inquiries.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0537662
Of special note, at 20 mins 40 seconds, the revelation that the insurance company specifically requested that Barbara Kahan’s name was left out of an abuse inquiry report (she was the author of Pindown report, known for fighting against abuse-in-care cover-ups)
I can’t get my head around why she is so important to all of their cover-ups, maybe she just knew too much or just got too close, but below I am quoting a post I made last year with a bunch of research I had done on her name being used for mass fraud since her death (she was even director of David Cameron’s Big Society Fund, which is mighty fine work for a dead woman…)
I think the programme highlighting that, even back twenty years ago, it was so important to shut her up, stop her being named as associated with an inquiry (because she was trustworthy, her name added more validity to the report) validates that research on the boiler-room scam and its links to abuse/blackmail/cover-ups/secret services is certainly an angle worth pursuing.
Why have they sullied her name in death by making her the posthumous patsy for mass fraud?!
Any help researching the Kahan angle by other forumites here would be much appreciated!!
|
Originally Posted by wideawakeclub
 I agree (and certainly hope) that the Exaro link to Temple Secretaries is very possibly a red herring (and maybe they’ve even been set up on this earlier, in order to discredit them now?) but it is never the less a fascinating and frightening “coincidence” that the identity of Barbara Joan Kahan (co-author of the Pindown child abuse report) is fraudulently used, following her death, to set up vast swathes of companies.It’s not IMHO a coincidental “other” Barbara Kahan; the middle name match I think does away with that (although for at least one directorship, the initial J was changed to stand for “Javed”, which will become clearer below)Just reposting my comment/research that I posted elsewhere last week on the whole affair here as it may provoke thought and some research!“Barbara Joan Kahan’s identity has been stolen since her death in 2000, albeit with varying dates of birth, to be the director of over 35,000 shell companies in the past 14 years for the purposes of MASSIVE fraud.http://www.thewhistleblowers.org/?p=39330
(edit:for the purposes of understanding the sheer scale, she has taken on the equivalent of seven new directorships a day every day for the past 14 years. Even if it’s a purely administrative thing, that’s pretty impressive for a dead woman!)David Cameron’s “Big Society” fund links back to this fraudulent theft of Kahan’s identity. Her name features here: https://eyreinternational.wordpress….2-giant-fraud/And would you believe it, coincidence of coincidences, it’s also the very same fraud that David Cameron’s brother had thrown out of court. https://sites.google.com/site/profge…-shell-company(edit: There’s the Javed connection)So now we’re left with the question of what is the real connection between all of this huge fraud and child abuse. Our Prime Minister certainly appears to know something about all of this and seemingly doesn’t want the links uncovered.And why specifically was Barbara Kahan chosen to be a posthumous patsy to this gigantic industrial-scale fraud? edit: possibly punishment in death for trying to name names and protect children in care during life?! Don’t know, just “thinking aloud”! The link that Zoompad found with Exaro is concerning (http://zoompad.blogspot.co.uk/2014/1…ara-kahan.html) it really does make one wonder what’s actually going on… Are they using the 40 year old “revelations” to deflect from the present day CLEAR LINKS between abuse, fraud, politics and the theft of Kahan’s identity?I hope not, I do have huge respect for their work, but it’s worth bearing in mind that if they hadn’t talked Simon Danczuk into not naming Leon Brittan as an abuser back in July at the select committee, we wouldn’t have had the Butler-Sloss and Woolf debacles. The inquiry would probably have had a chair since the Summer rather than sitting with no chair months and months later. I also wonder what directorships Barbara held whilst alive. If somebody wanted to bury that information, the creation of 35,000 red herring files to create a “haystack” would certainly be a good way to go about it. On a sidenote, The Lord Laming CBE DL gave the opening address at this memorial event for Barbara Kahan http://www.davidlane.org/children/chdec/bkahan.htm The Queen appointed him to her Privy Council three weeks before the home secretary announced the CSA Inquiry. Alan Levy QC also spoke at that same event. He was co-author with Barbara of the Pindown abuse report. His thoughts on inquiries are perhaps more relevant today than ever. Another funny thing… The Barbara and Vladimir Kahan Trust apparently ceased to exist back in 2006: http://apps.charitycommission.gov.uk…idiaryNumber=0 Yet the children and young people’s charity Buttle UK claims that the trust is one of its supporters and funders: http://www.buttleuk.org/pages/our-supporters.html It’s possible that the trust ceased to exist as a charity but still exists as a bank account, I suppose, just found it worth mentioning. I sincerely hope Zoompad is alive and well by the way, her last blogpost and tweet are very worrying.” |
(incidentally, Zoompad IS alive and well!)”
BARBARA AND VLADIMIR KAHAN TRUST
http://opencharities.org/charities/1026077
Barbara Kahan, Peter Righton, Louis Minster and Malta
https://bitsofbooksblog.wordpress.com/2014/09/09/barbara-kahan-and-peter-righton/
Comment: “Absolutely essential reading – clarifies the links between Louis Minster, former director of Social Services at Richmond at the time of the Elm Guest House Scandal, Barbara Kahan, leading figure in the social work profession and at one point Minster’s boss, and Peter Righton, the paedophile who corrupted the whole profession.”
Comment: “Barbara Joan Kahan’s identity has been stolen since her death in 2000, albeit with varying dates of birth, to be the director of over 35,000 shell companies in the past 14 years for the purposes of MASSIVE fraud.
http://www.thewhistleblowers.org/?p=39330
David Cameron’s “Big Society” fund links back to this fraudulent theft of Kahan’s identity. Her name features here:
https://eyreinternational.wordpress.com/2012/04/08/fraudulent-prime-minster-starts-up-the-big-society-fund-part-2-giant-fraud/
And would you believe it, coincidence of coincidences, it’s also the very same fraud that David Cameron’s brother had thrown out of court.
https://sites.google.com/site/profgeorgeleesrevelations/dear-taxpayer-i-want-to-tell-you-about-the-prime-minister-s-boiler-room-in-finchley-road/barbara-kahan-from-finchley-who-becomes-mohamed-javed-akhtar-in-the-next-tier-of-the-ponzi-shell-company
So now we’re left with the question of what is the real connection between all of this huge fraud and child abuse. Our Prime Minister certainly knows something about all of this and doesn’t want the links uncovered.
And why specifically was Barbara Kahan chosen to be a posthumous patsy to this gigantic industrial-scale fraud?
The link that Zoompad found with Exaro is concerning (http://zoompad.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/new-sparta-limited-barbara-kahan.html) it really does make one wonder what’s actually going on… Are they using the 40 year old “revelations” to deflect from the present day CLEAR LINKS between abuse, fraud, politics and the theft of Kahan’s identity?
I hope not, I do have respect for their work, but it’s worth bearing in mind that if they hadn’t talked Simon Danczuk into not naming Leon Brittan as an abuser back in July at the select committee, we wouldn’t have had the Butler-Sloss and Woolf debacles and the inquiry would probably have had a chair since the Summer rather than sitting with no chair months and months later.
I also wonder what directorships Barbara held whilst alive. If somebody wanted to bury that information, the creation of 35,000 red herring files to create a “haystack” would certainly be a good way to go about it.
On a sidenote, The Lord Laming CBE DL gave the opening address at this memorial event for Barbara Kahan http://zoompad.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/new-sparta-limited-barbara-kahan.html
The Queen appointed him to her Privy Council three weeks before the home secretary announced the CSA Inquiry.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/privy-council-appointment-lord-laming
Alan Levy QC also spoke at that same event. He was co-author with Barbara of the Pindown report. He believed that their report was hampered by not being statutory and was watered down and obstructed by the government.. Ring any bells? #CSAinquiry
His thoughts on inquiries are perhaps more relevant today than ever.
http://www2.essex.ac.uk/clc/hi/childright/article/197/cR197_5.doc
Another funny thing… The Barbara and Vladimir Khan Trust apparently ceased to exist back in 2006: http://apps.charitycommission.gov.uk/Showcharity/RegisterOfCharities/RemovedCharityMain.aspx?RegisteredCharityNumber=1026077&SubsidiaryNumber=0
Yet the children anf young people’s charity Buttle claims that the trust is one of its supporters and funders: http://www.buttleuk.org/pages/our-supporters.html
It’s possible that the trust ceased to exist as a charity but still exists as a bank account, I suppose, just found it worth mentioning.”
ukgovernmentwatch 