[UK’s Oligochracy

D of W

1. £7.9 billion

Reuben Bros

2. £6.9 billion

 

Reuben Bros

3. £6 billion

 

 

 

Cadogan Fam

4. £4 billion

 

mike-ashley

5. £3.3 billion

 

 

 

 

“Oxfam reports the country’s five richest families now own more wealth than the poorest 20% of the population.  In its report, a Tale of Two Britains(mb-a-tale-of-two-britains-inequality-uk-170314-en-1), Oxfam said the poorest 20% inthe UK had wealth totalling £28.1bn – an average of just £2,230 each. The latest rich list from Forbes magazine showed that the five top UK entries were the family of the

*Duke of Westminster,

*David and Simon Reuben,

*Hinduja brothers,

*Cadogan family

Sports Direct retail boss *Mike Ashley

– between them had property, savings and other assets worth £28.2bn.  These are Britain’s own top oligarchs (aside from the Russian ones that live in London).

Indeed,the 100 wealthiest people in the UK have as much money as the poorest 18million – 30% of all people.  The total wealth of these oligarchs rose£25bn last year to £257bn to surpass the £225bn held by the poorest 30% of British households.  And remember household wealth consists of the ownership of a house or flat, pension fund and other possessions like cars.  Total household wealth in the UK is £10trn, with the top 10% having£967bn and the bottom 10% just £13bn.  The bottom 10% really have no wealth at all except old cars and a few personal possessions.

Imagine a room with 100 hundred people.  90 people are so short they can hardly reach the door handle to get out.  Another nine people are only high enough to get a drink from the table. But one person is so huge that his or her head hits the ceiling and bursts through it.  Such is the scale of inequality and concentration of wealth.  Even the top 10% of wealth holders really own only their house that they live in along with maybe a reasonable pension. It’s the top 1% or even the top 0.1% who really have wealth in stocks, bonds and  commercial property and businesses etc.

You see what really matters is not personal wealth but the ownership of the means of production. That gives you power as well as wealth – this is what oligarchs have. What is decisive for capitalism is surplus value (profit, interest and rent), not wage income or spending.  Control of that surplus is key.  The main feature of the last 100 years of capitalism has not been growing inequality of income. The main feature has been a growing concentration and centralisation of wealth,not income.  And it has been in the wealth held in means of production and not just household wealth.” http://thenextrecession.wordpress.com/2014/03/18/inequality-and-britains-oligarchs/

Pictures from – http://www.occupy.com/article/britains-five-richest-families-worth-more-poorest-20