UK Column News 28 January 2019

https://www.ukcolumn.org/live

UK Column UTube

  • MR: The Ministery of Justice recently said ”The British Constitution has become very much part of the BREXIT Debate.  As it stands it is not codified in a single document.”  It has made fundamental errors in its statement & to say The Bill of Rights & Magna Carta can be amended is not correct.  The British Government doesn’t seem to understand the British Constitution situation.
  • DE: Ah. Well, they do.  What they don’t want is for the people to understand it.  They’re afraid the people knowing what the tooling & the correct deployment of the Constitution could allow.  So it’s an awareness campaign really.  To say it’s not written down is a complete misrepresentation.
  • Did the Queen make a veiled comment on Brexit at Women’s Institute meeting?
  • JRM said Downing Street asked Queen to make BREXIT intervention
  • MR: The Queen can only make a statement after advice from her ministers so we assume the advice came from Downing Street.

https://twitter.com/Jacob_Rees_Mogg/status/1089805308367720448
https://twitter.com/JackBMontgomery/status/1088397780320743427

  • DE: We haven’t replaced the Divine Right of Kings to be numbered by The Divine Right of Parliament!
  • MR: I think that we are looking at the Divine Right of Government here.  In the last 10 or so years we have seen Government trying to sideline Parliament in every possible way.
  • MR: Matt Handicock talked about Martial Law on Andrew Marr Show at the weekend.
  • Independent: Brexit: Cabinet minister fails to totally rule out martial law after no-deal withdrawal from EU
  • MR: This would be via the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 Section 2 No 23
  • MR: It says here – Emergency Regulations may not amend The Human rights Act 1998 (C42) – which is EU Leg which doesn’t fit very well with the British Constitution which is based on Common Law & Common Law Principles.
  • MR: The Bill of Rights was not passed in a normal parliament so this Government should not be trying to put its hands on it at all.  Under Emergency Leg if we have an attempt to appeal or amend parts of our Constitution then perhaps we get to the bottom of what this suggestion of civil contingencies is all about.  It’s not about Martial Law – it’s about trashing the Constitution.
  • DE: We can see a direction of travel from this government & it’s not good.  What’s the legal, mechanical & procedural way of their continuing with this ”marriage” to the EU – it’s not a divorce.  Coming back to Henry viii & Thomas Moore & the ”ministerial powers” we are seeing the Council trying to find a way of saying ”yes’‘ to the ”marriage” & this in a way of getting their mitts on the Bill of Rights.
  • DE: This ”Crisis Lever” seems to be a big Lever in Europe.  Declaring a ”Crisis” is the way Europe ”gets things done.”
  • DE: There’s a void of acumen amongst MPs on the Bill of Rights so if Dark Forces want to start ‘‘molesting’‘ it it’s going to be easy.  If a new MP you need to see the 1924 Version of the Erskine May to see what’s actually in the Bill of Rights.
  • Conservative Home: Richard Kemp and Lee Rotherham: The backstop’s not the only danger in May’s deal. Its defence plans will undermine NATO.
  • Vets4Brit: BREXIT’S TROUBLED FLANK – THE DEPARTURE DEAL AND EU DEFENCE INTEGRATION
  • MR: Working towards the ”Common European Standing Army.” This is important because although it may not look like it the UK has not had a standing army since 1688.  So Parliamentary approval is required for us to have a standing army at all. If under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 the Bill of Rights – which is the act that removed the ability of Britain to have a standing army – if that act falls under the remit of parliamentary amendment (unconstitutionally) are we seeing the British Government setting themselves up to be able to have a ”standing army”? 
  • The government can’t commit to any treaty if they don’t have a ”standing army” to commit.
  • DE: Several things wrong. 1. The Military Unification has NOT been included in the Brexit debate. Not evaluated by MPs or Parliament.  2.  They are using the term ”integration” when it is actually ”single point CMD & Kontrol”  3.The EU doesn’t talk about ”Defence Union” & UK MPs are afraid of the term
  • DE: Bill of Rights says you can’t HAVE a standing army & that’s what the EU wants.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.